tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post5558803909295921633..comments2024-03-18T20:38:51.670+11:00Comments on steadyaku47: Who are the Malays?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger52125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-27930558353475618862012-03-04T09:11:45.488+11:002012-03-04T09:11:45.488+11:00sad Malays are ruled over and cheated by the Malay...sad Malays are ruled over and cheated by the Malay Indian breed. always being spin around, i think Malays should start defensing themselves from the United Mamak National Organisation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-55506969228410965742012-02-14T14:11:47.640+11:002012-02-14T14:11:47.640+11:00LOL
Some dumb c**ts don't understand the diff...LOL<br /><br />Some dumb c**ts don't understand the difference between Pariah and Parish, and they still dare talk like they are English experts.<br /><br />Must a Bangsar Malaysian.<br /><br />More corruption in Msia cause it is a much bigger country than SG.<br /><br />More per capita I doubt it.<br /><br />60bn SGD loss is 150BnMYR.<br /><br />A huge sum !<br /><br />http://johnharding.com/2011/12/30/singapore-president-tony-tan-lost-nearly-42-billion-dollars-of-singapores-soverign-wealth/<br /><br />And YES it is not corruption perse but it still evidence against the lie that SG gov. is efficient and accountable (Tony Tan is now President of SG - what bullshit ) <br /><br />ASR <br /><br />parish haha hahaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-3483418022416317032012-02-13T17:54:19.961+11:002012-02-13T17:54:19.961+11:00Yes, I like to be called pariah. It doesnt meatter...Yes, I like to be called pariah. It doesnt meatter! <br /><br />The most important is what is published here openly by this writer. The loser in Malaysia is the Malays!<br /><br />The one who labelled others as parish are themselve parish 1st! All religions teach everyone is equal. So, the one who labels other as parish, they themselves could not tahan to tell other as parish.<br /><br />Singapore is least corruption while Malaysia is full of corruption everywhere (culture bred by Mathir. Even at kampung level, we see how corrupted these people even buying banana at a small town, they added extra amount to original amount. A seller of banana told so!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-272406660592337692012-02-10T05:16:22.741+11:002012-02-10T05:16:22.741+11:00Whoops there I go again.
ASRWhoops there I go again.<br /><br />ASRAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-5288339164021417072012-02-10T03:47:19.246+11:002012-02-10T03:47:19.246+11:00You know nothing, I actually loved in the doghole ...You know nothing, I actually loved in the doghole down south for 5 years.<br /><br />no corruption ? <br /><br />hahahaha<br /><br />yeah of course that's why all the press is owned and controlled by PAP.<br /><br />heard of the bukit nassim condo scandal involving the Lees?<br /><br />result? they were somehow " cleared" by a parliamentary <br />" committee"<br /><br />SG gov. never loses money ?<br /><br />tell that to the millions of Sgers who saw their funds shrinks by something like 30BSGD in 2009.<br /><br />It's a FACT admitted by their own press.<br /><br />Efficient gov. my ass.<br /><br />And by the way it's PARIAH like you not " parish " whatever the fuck that is supposed to be.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-74034514429355653362012-02-09T17:05:05.505+11:002012-02-09T17:05:05.505+11:00It doesn't matter how parish is Singapore.
T...It doesn't matter how parish is Singapore. <br /><br />The most important is Malaysia has national debt while Singapore does not have. This is about managing national resources.<br /><br />You still want to appoint the MD (UMNO) and his managers (MCA, MIC, Gerakan, PBB, etc.) to manage your company (Malaysia) when your company (Malaysia) is losing money and they taken out your profit RM888 billion from year 2000 to 2008 as reported by Global Finance Integrity : http://iff-update.gfintegrity.org/<br /><br />I would certain fire these MD and all those managers. <br /><br />The problem is true Malays have been fooled long ago by Mathir who is not a true Malay. Mathir was good at privitisation to give money to his cronies.<br /><br />That is why we see Malaysia's debt is mounting every year. <br /><br />Giving RM250 million to Sharizat (who is also not a true Malay) a family to run feedlot?<br /><br />It should be 250 (Ahmad, Ah Chong and Muthu) each get RM1 million to share on the feedlot!<br /><br />No wonder rural areas of Malays in Sarawak are still without electricity while Taib having billion RM property overseas: see his property portfolia at www.sarawakreport.org.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-27164882923663688212012-02-09T16:56:11.590+11:002012-02-09T16:56:11.590+11:00Parish dog country Singapore? It doesn't matte...Parish dog country Singapore? It doesn't matter how parish is Singapore.<br /><br />The most important is Malays in Malaysia today could not compete with Malays in Singapore. <br /><br />Malaysia Ringgit today could not compete with B$ or S$ although all almost the same 40 years ago.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-68628083082701012392012-02-09T09:40:20.619+11:002012-02-09T09:40:20.619+11:00keep forgetting to sign off.
ASRkeep forgetting to sign off.<br /><br />ASRAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-11630607254889751502012-02-09T09:39:39.331+11:002012-02-09T09:39:39.331+11:00ahhhh.
You were doing so well until you brought u...ahhhh.<br /><br />You were doing so well until you brought up that pariah dog cuntry Singapore.<br /><br />Never ever assume MY Chinese all support Singapore.<br /><br />Wo shi huaren wo zhi dao singapore bu shi yigezhende huaren guojia.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-21898424316888059022012-02-09T03:17:38.711+11:002012-02-09T03:17:38.711+11:00Allow me to share my view. I am 3rd generation of ...Allow me to share my view. I am 3rd generation of Chinese immigrants of Malaysia.<br /><br />The true Malays people have now been fooled since decades ago especially by Mathir who is not a true Malay.<br /><br />The quota system for example for university intake is one of the reasons causing true Malays to be unable to be at world stage today.<br /><br />You have to go thru hard time to excel. Look at the 1st generation of Chinese in New Villages? Just ask one of those 1st generation of New Village which established by British 60 years ago. The 1st generation of Chinese started the New Villages and there were about 450 villages after world war 2.<br /><br />Even during world ward 2, Chinese went into jungle and hid away from Japanese army. Life was also hard in jungle. <br /><br />During world war 2, Chinese became communist to counter Japanese armies. After world war 2, they countered British occupation.<br /><br />It was such a hard time for the 1st generation of Chinese living in New Village where Emergency (Darulat)Ordinance was imposed and the Chinese lost their freedom during that time.<br /><br />The 1st generation of Chinese in the New Village built from zero on the limited land giving by British.<br /><br />Today, we see FELDA and FELCRA are assisted much by present UMNO government. Consequently, the UMNO government has not given the chance for the true Malays to go thru hard time since 1957.<br /><br />You have to let your children to go thru hard time, to study hard and not to let them be Mat Rempit or hanging around in street. <br /><br />The true Malays have failed to notice that open competition education is the most important like the one faced by Chinese today.<br /><br />Chinese always believe that even being poor, we could not be poor in education. <br /><br />Another thought is that Chinese have the option to go for Christianity, but today majority of Chinese are non Christi1ans. In Indonesia, they also have freedom to choose their religion. But Indonesia is still the world largest muslim country. <br /><br />My point is they have to give freedom to true Malays so that they could excel in life. But today, we see too much fear has been on the true Malays becaue they have not freedom and choices.<br /><br />They, the government, should assist the true Malays to excel in education not imposing quota for university intake because they think they do not need to excel academically and still could go to university OR they would think "doesn't matter" when their parents have not paid much attention. <br /><br />Today, we see MARA also fails because true competition in open system (like the one in Singapore) does not exist in MARA.<br /><br />Today, we see Malays in Singapore are much better off than Malays in Malaysia.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-5988253315697887832012-02-06T21:09:04.415+11:002012-02-06T21:09:04.415+11:00laws are not followed in Malaysia, any fool knows ...laws are not followed in Malaysia, any fool knows that.<br /><br />UMNO decides who is Malay, too bad for you old fool.<br /><br />I think this new wave of dravid mamaks are mostly fakes, in it only for side benefits.<br /><br />Puiiii to you.<br /><br />ASFAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-86648316745927739352012-02-04T11:01:13.485+11:002012-02-04T11:01:13.485+11:00Anon February 3, 2012 7:09:00 AM
your last state...Anon February 3, 2012 7:09:00 AM <br /><br />your last statement, has two parts:<br /><br />(1) the spirit of this article was not to question anyone's heritage -- I think it was questioning the heritage. The distinction that is being made is that there are the "constitutional malays" and the "melayu tulen". My point is that all malays in malaysia are constitutional malays. <br /><br />(2) if it were not for the distribution of wealth according to race and religion, then we would not have such a massive exodus of mamaks into the malay race. --- it cannot be considered as an exodus. The mamaks are not lying or cheating when they say they are malays. They are exercising their right as enshrined in the constitution. In 1957, the population of Malaya was roughly in equal proportion between the Malay and the Non-Malays. Our founding fathers thought it wise to bring into the fold as many malays as they could into the community. Today there is a challenge to that wisdom. In the same way the Non-malays are challenging malay rights and privileges. In itself this is not wrong. The Constitution can be changed and indeed if it needs be it should be changed in the light of changing circumstances. But for today, u cannot argue that the Mamak is NOT a malay. It was already decided by our founding fathers.akbar khan haneefahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13780150352192866502noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-17791367800380814252012-02-04T10:39:27.602+11:002012-02-04T10:39:27.602+11:00Chow YW
if the migrant is a migrant in malaysia, ...Chow YW<br /><br />if the migrant is a migrant in malaysia, he is not a malay. To be a malay, u need to be a citizen. Tht's my understanding.akbar khan haneefahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13780150352192866502noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-6751736998370576682012-02-04T01:41:08.472+11:002012-02-04T01:41:08.472+11:00oh that was me :
anti self racismoh that was me :<br /><br />anti self racismAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-10076117945126858442012-02-04T01:39:14.519+11:002012-02-04T01:39:14.519+11:00"If akbar khan haneefa is ashamed to be mamak..."If akbar khan haneefa is ashamed to be mamak, so what? Are you then going to make fun of him being mamak and therefore prove that that there is a reason to be ashamed? "<br /><br />Another fucking cockbrained statement fro the bangsar yuppie fag brigade.<br /><br />If he ashamed of being Indian = saying something wrong with being Indian = RACIST.<br /><br />How you seem to eager to be anti racist EXCEPT when it comes to the Indian race ? <br /><br />What a load of bullshit your anti racism is?<br /><br />It is just a save face cover for you to outbreed out of your Indian skins.<br /><br />Bottom line, I have no respect or someone who is self racist and I will certainly make it my business to obstruct his perversions and not only will I laff at him but if I see him in the street I will tell him straight in the face then we'll see what happens .Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-6129787014167616162012-02-03T07:39:18.437+11:002012-02-03T07:39:18.437+11:00I guess there is a problem when your race becomes ...I guess there is a problem when your race becomes a huge determining factor in your future. It matters not if the person is ashamed to be whatever he is, and claims to be something else. If akbar khan haneefa is ashamed to be mamak, so what? Are you then going to make fun of him being mamak and therefore prove that that there is a reason to be ashamed?<br /><br />I think, it matters more on what is the "push factor" for people to go as far as to decide to change their race. If it's financial, and in most cases, it is, clearly there is a problem, not in the definition of the race, but in the distribution of wealth and opportunities in our country. <br /><br />I am a constitutional Malay. I resent people saying that I am ashamed of what I am. You see, is it fair for me to lose out on the opportunities that my brothers are so readily given? <br /><br />Now, is the solution to this problem, to redefine the constitution to exclude mamaks, or chinese convert? Or is the real solution to ensure proper division of money? I believe it is the latter. <br /><br />antiselfracism, you asked if a malay can decide who is a malay or not. Of course they can. That's how the constitution was written, was it not? Malays chose people to represent them and those people chose other people to write the constitution which made the definition of malay glaringly obvious. As far as I know, which admittedly, isn't a whole lot, I'm only a student, there isn't a lot of debate amongst the malay crowd today on whether mamak people should be let into the exclusive club of kelab melayu. So I don't think that the answer is an "unerring no" The Malay people have spoken and it has already been decided what the definition of Malay is. Clearly, a larger number of Malays benefits Malays because then quotas for Malays would increase and other races become minorities. Whether this is good or not is an entirely different issue. <br /><br />I believe the spirit of this article was not to question anyone's heritage or to question the constitution's definition of malay. It was to bring up the point that, if it were not for the distribution of wealth according to race and religion, then we would not have such a massive exodus of mamaks into the malay race.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-19082382427476630402012-02-03T02:48:30.337+11:002012-02-03T02:48:30.337+11:00" WHAT KIND OF STUPID JUSTIFICATION IS THIS. ..." WHAT KIND OF STUPID JUSTIFICATION IS THIS. "<br /><br />Ah HAHA <br /><br />Copying = 1st sign of panic and defeat. <br /><br />AND who are you to tell us ? <br /><br />we need to recognise the idiots among us and contain them.<br /><br />LOOK in the mirror that's where you will find all of them.<br /><br />ha ha<br /><br />Are you telling us now that - a Malay can't decide who is Malay or not ?<br /><br />What a load of Bullshit.<br /><br />antiselfracismAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-32614260529146707852012-02-02T22:24:01.253+11:002012-02-02T22:24:01.253+11:00I am posting an extract of Article 160 (2) of the ...I am posting an extract of Article 160 (2) of the Malaysian Constitution below which defines what is a Malay. <br /><br /> "Malay" means a person who professes the religion of Islam, habitually speaks the Malay language, conforms to Malay custom and -<br /><br />(a) was before Merdeka Day born in the Federation or in Singapore or born of parents one of whom was born in the Federation or in Singapore, or is on that day domiciled in the Federation or in Singapore; or<br /><br />(b) is the issue of such a person;<br /><br />From the above, it is clear that one who professes just 'the religion of Islam, habitually speaks the Malay language, conforms to Malay custom', but is not born before or on Merdeka Day in the Federation or Singapore or descendants of at least one parent who is born or live in the Federation or Singapore on Merdeka Day is NOT a constitutional Malay. <br /><br />Similarly, a latter day migrant without any family roots in Malaysia, who arrives after Merdeka Day, CANNOT be a Malay even though he professes 'the religion of Islam, habitually speaks the Malay language, conforms to Malay custom' <br /><br />Can someone correct me if I am wrong in the interpretation?Chow YWnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-86153150558860928892012-02-02T13:26:12.036+11:002012-02-02T13:26:12.036+11:00If Malaysia is to progress, we need to recognise t...If Malaysia is to progress, we need to recognise the idiots among us and contain them.<br /><br />This is the question i asked:<br /><br />Why can't the mamak call himself a malay? Please provide your justification.<br /><br />THE ANSWER:<br />Because that is not up to him.<br />That is for the Malays to decide and the answer is an unerring NO.<br /><br />WHAT KIND OF STUPID JUSTIFICATION IS THIS. NO LEGAL REASON. SORRY LAH BRO. THE CONSTITUTION DEFINED THE MALAY. NOT U. WE DON'T NEED TO RE-INVENT THE WHEEL. <br /><br />I THINK I HAVE DEBATED THIS ENOUGH WITH YOU. YOUR INTELLECTUAL CAPACITY IS NOW OBVIOUS. YOU ARE AN IDIOT. THANKS FOR YOUR TIMEakbar khan haneefahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13780150352192866502noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-3392279695237673242012-02-02T06:24:17.150+11:002012-02-02T06:24:17.150+11:00" Why can't the mamak call himself a mala..." Why can't the mamak call himself a malay? "<br /><br />What a fucking stupid question.<br /><br />Because that is not up to him.<br /><br />That is for the Malays to decide and the answer is an unerring NO.<br /><br />I take it from this and previous half truths and lies your kind so famous for that you are indeed ashamed of being Indian.<br /><br />antiselfracismAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-47464740893820507352012-02-01T23:44:04.302+11:002012-02-01T23:44:04.302+11:00Am i ashamed to be an indian?
1. I already answer...Am i ashamed to be an indian?<br /><br />1. I already answered the question. It is NOT profitable for the mamak to be an Indian. It is better for them finanancially to be a Malay.<br /><br />2. If they call themselves as indians, they become a minority within a minority. Their interests are not looked after.<br /><br />3. The constitution allows mamaks to call themselves as Malays. So why shouldnt they take advantage of the benefits. As long as they don't do anything illegal, unethical or immoral, is it your business whether they call themselves as Malays or as hotttentots?<br /><br />Since you have asked me a question, let me ask u in return. Why can't the mamak call himself a malay? Please provide your justification.akbar khan haneefahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13780150352192866502noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-55888468737345330452012-02-01T19:01:30.284+11:002012-02-01T19:01:30.284+11:00Lun to your pot.
Answer the question -
Are you a...Lun to your pot.<br /><br />Answer the question -<br /><br />Are you ashamed of being IndianAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-60836313299841078062012-02-01T13:50:46.897+11:002012-02-01T13:50:46.897+11:00Let's look at the 3rd and final issue:
"I...Let's look at the 3rd and final issue:<br />"It should not matter if you are a Malay or a Non-Malay." <br /><br />It matters because the Constitution has given the Malays certain priviledges. I don't want to go into a protracted argument of what these priviledges mean and the debate between rights and priviledges. Suffice to say, a distinction has been drawn in the Constitution. And that distinction has undoubtedly a rationale.<br /><br />Nations reserve the right to determine whether they favour the melting pot or multi-culturalism. For example, America favours the melting pot. Whereas in Malaysia, it is multi culturalism.akbar khan haneefahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13780150352192866502noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-6636474052254191422012-02-01T13:24:27.086+11:002012-02-01T13:24:27.086+11:00tsk, tsk
another one with his head buried in the ...tsk, tsk<br /><br />another one with his head buried in the sand.<br /><br />Yes, u are right. No one should listen to me. I am a nobody. <br /><br />But let's look at what u are saying:<br /><br />"Lastly no, no pure mamak can be a malay.<br /><br />I believe at least 1 of your parents must be malay."<br /><br />Are u trying to define the constitution? And who are u? What are your credentials? <br /><br />look at his statement: "i believe ..." What is this belief based on? on fact? on what?<br /><br />I have given Tun Mohahammed Suffian's interpretation of the constitution where it says clearly that an indian is a malay if ... (reread my earlier post). I have also given the book reference. What has this person given? His belief...... sigh.<br /><br />If u cant do any better than providing your belief as a source of your argument, can i suggest u keep your head buried? Ignorance they say is bliss....akbar khan haneefahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13780150352192866502noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8498120352601868144.post-30072091763641852072012-02-01T03:43:40.859+11:002012-02-01T03:43:40.859+11:00AK is a joker.
As if anyone cares what he says or...AK is a joker.<br /><br />As if anyone cares what he says or thinks.<br /><br />the arguments have all been made - RE-READ it !<br /><br />Also unlike you, I'm not a wannabe politician thus i can use any MF name I want.<br /><br />Get it ?<br /><br />Lastly no, no pure mamak can be a malay.<br /><br />I believe at least 1 of your parents must be malay.<br /><br />why do you want to be malay?<br /><br />ashamed of being indian ?<br /><br />anitselfracismAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com