Investigations into 1MDB-Related Fund Flows through Singapore
Joint Statement by Attorney-General’s Chambers, Singapore (AGC)
Commercial Affairs Department, Singapore Police Force (CAD)
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)
Commercial Affairs Department, Singapore Police Force (CAD)
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)
Singapore, 21 July 2016 … The AGC, CAD, and MAS announced today in a
joint statement that the Singapore authorities have been investigating
various 1MDB-related fund flows through Singapore, for possible money
laundering, securities fraud, cheating, and other offences committed in
Singapore.
We note the statement by the US Attorney General on 20 July 2016,
seeking the forfeiture and recovery of more than US$1 billion in assets
associated with an international conspiracy to launder funds related to
1MDB.
Singapore’s investigations began in March 2015 and are still in
progress. The fund flows being investigated include those connected
with Good Star Limited (Seychelles), Aabar Investments PJS Limited
(BVI), Aabar Investments PJS Limited (Seychelles), and Tanore Finance
Corp. (BVI). The criminal investigations by CAD are targeted at
individuals suspected of committing offences in Singapore related to
these flows, while MAS has been examining the financial institutions
through which the funds flowed for possible regulatory breaches and
control lapses.
In the course of the investigations, bank accounts belonging to
various individuals have been seized and dealings in properties
belonging to some of these individuals have been curtailed. The assets
amount in total to S$240 million. Of these bank accounts and
properties, about S$120 million belong to Mr Low Taek Jho and his
immediate family.
Singapore has made a number of requests for information to countries
where these funds originated from or were subsequently sent to. Some of
these requests are still being processed. Several countries have
likewise requested Singapore’s assistance in relation to questionable
fund flows pertaining to monies suspected to have originated from 1MDB.
Singapore has promptly acceded to all such requests, in compliance with
our international obligations.
Appropriate actions will be brought against those who have broken
Singapore’s laws. To-date, two individuals – Mr Yeo Jiawei and Mr
Kelvin Ang – have been charged for various offences. Several other
individuals are still being questioned or investigated.
Statement by Monetary Authority of Singapore
Actions to be taken against Financial Institutions
Singapore, 21 July 2016 … The MAS announced today that its
supervisory examinations of financial institutions (FIs) with
1MDB-related fund flows have revealed a complex international web of
transactions involving multiple entities and individuals operating in
several jurisdictions. Certain FIs in Singapore were among those used as
conduits for these transactions. MAS’ supervisory examinations, which
began in March 2015, found lapses and weaknesses in anti-money
laundering (AML) controls in these Singapore-based FIs. MAS will be
taking actions against these FIs.
MAS’ supervisory examinations included detailed onsite inspections,
and analysis of information obtained from regulators abroad. They
revealed extensive layering of transactions and subterfuge aimed at
disguising the nature of certain activities and fund flows. In some
instances, shell or unauthorised companies domiciled in various
jurisdictions were used to conceal the true beneficiaries of the funds.
MAS’ findings to-date on the lapses and weaknesses in Singapore-based
FIs in managing 1MDB-related flows are summarised below. The FIs
include banks, capital market intermediaries, and a remittance agent.
BSI Bank Limited Singapore (BSI Bank)
MAS completed its examination of BSI Bank in May 2016. MAS decided to withdraw its status as a merchant bank in view of its serious breaches of AML requirements and poor management oversight, and gross misconduct by some of the bank’s staff.
DBS Bank Ltd (DBS), Standard Chartered Bank, Singapore Branch (SCB), and UBS AG, Singapore Branch (UBS)
MAS has completed its inspections of DBS, SCB, and UBS, and is now finalising its assessments.
The preliminary findings are that there were instances of control
failings in all three banks and, in some cases, weaknesses in the
processes for accepting clients and monitoring transactions. There was
also undue delay in detecting and reporting suspicious transactions.
The deficiencies observed in DBS, SCB and UBS related to lapses in
specific processes and by individual officers. The lapses were serious
in their own right, and will be met by firm regulatory actions against
the banks. However, the MAS’ inspections did not reveal pervasive
control weaknesses or staff misconduct within these banks, unlike in the
case of BSI Bank.
Falcon Private Bank Limited, Singapore Branch (Falcon PBS)
MAS completed its onsite inspection of Falcon PBS in April 2016, and found substantial breaches of AML regulations, including failure to adequately assess irregularities in activities pertaining to customers’ accounts and to file suspicious transaction reports.
However, the supervisory examination of Falcon PBS is still ongoing
as the oversight and management of certain key client relationships were
done out of the bank’s head office in Switzerland. MAS is examining
information obtained from Falcon PBS’ head office and has asked for
further details.
Raffles Money Change (RMC)
MAS has completed its examination of RMC, a licensed money changer and remittance agent. The examination revealed weak management oversight, inadequate risk management practices and internal controls. Specific findings include failure to identify beneficial owners, verify authenticity of remittance instructions, and assess if a customer’s remittance activities are consistent with the profile of the customer. MAS is finalising regulatory actions against RMC.
MAS’ examination of certain other FIs are ongoing. More details will
be provided when these examinations are completed. MAS will take
decisive regulatory actions against any FI that has breached regulations
or failed to meet the expected AML standards.
No comments:
Post a Comment