steadyaku47

Wednesday, 28 May 2014

Helen Ang on Dyana.


Buku bertemu ruas: Why Dapster lies will be met with Malay fist

When the Chinese are willing to out and out support a slippery eel, then the national problem runs very deep. It goes beyond simply the shady character of the DAP Teluk Intan candidate.
The DAP touted Dyana as a “lawyer”. After checks reveal that she is not registered with the Bar, the DAP had to backpedal and concede that she is a “non-practicing lawyer”.
To recap, Dyana Sofya said her mother left Perkasa because Yammy
(a) “could not commit to the organisation after moving away from Perak” (first excuse given)
(b) “no longer believed in Perkasa” (excuse changed a few days later)
(c) However the mother announced yesterday in a press conference, seated beside Kit Siang, that she WILL leave Perkasa, meaning she had not yet left the movement but was planning to do so only now
Lim Kit Siang says: “Her mother is not the candidate. I don’t know why are we on a wild goose chase.”

Two things:

(1) The issue is about Dyana not being upfront with the truth and her story that slithers here and there
(2) DAP double standards
As young blogger Aiman Amani has so ably pointed out, Rosmah Mansor is not a politician either but Kit Siang himself has targetted the PM’s wife so many times.

Evangelista Bintang Lima

DoubleFaceMouths
In this matter of sneakiness and shiftiness, I fault her Chinese handlers and DAP supporters more than I do Dyana Sofya. They are legion compared to Dyana who is one individual.
We can see from the menegakkan benang basah responses defending her lies that to the DAP urbanites, winning is everything. They have little concern for the Teluk Intan rural inhabitants whose interests are better served by the BN candidate.
Thus they condone Dyana’s lies.
They equivocate and make up all sorts of excuses to justify the telling of lies as a principle of realpolitik.
The pro-opposition media is complicit in all of this; their reporting is skewed to favour Dyana whereas story angles favourable to the BN are downplayed or buried.
Oh and by the way, Malaysiakini deliberately selected these pictures (below) of Dyana’s Gerakan opponents to publish in juxtaposition to the photogenic beauty contest aspirant [SI].
MahSiewKiong
Gerakan

Packaging and marketing lies

DAP politicking at its core is about telling lies. They can make black to be white and vice versa.
And they will go to the extent of  running smear campaigns against critics who point out and highlight how the DAP shooting stars just can’t stop lying.
To the Dapsters, the ends justify the means. In their pursuit of Putrajaya, they have made the Culture of Fitnah the national culture of Malaysian Chinese who support the opposition.
This brings us to the core question: What kind of people are they?
see-saw2

Branding and promotion

I can’t imagine that I could want someone who’s incapable of getting her story straight to be the Yang Berhormat representing me in the august House. Parliament is after all the highest legislative body in the land.
Yet among the Dapsters, they have no qualms at all. That’s why they elected evangelista after evangelista to public office.
And herein is the crux of the matter: The DAP evangelistas
Democratic vote
ABOVE: Dapsters say Chinese who support BN are “stupid and shameless”

The ‘Allah’ word thieves

Some days ago, Umno Youth Wilayah Persekutuan threatened to burn down the DAP headquarters in Pudu, KL. They resorted to physical intimidation as a response to verbal provocation by a DAP Penang Adun.
It’s fair to frame the racial tensions in our country as emanating from the Umno-Malay vs DAP-Chinese battle.
Religious tensions emanate from the Muslim vs Christian conflict — the attempted robbery of the ‘Allah’ word, the Jais seizure of the Malay ‘Allah’ bibles, curbs on church planting and Christianization, the attacks on the UiTM seminar, and the strongly suspected dakwah that is ongoing to convert Malays to Christianity.
whitepaper1
The excerpt below is taken from the write-up by Muafakat sec-gen A. Karim Omar in his blog entry yesterday.

“Seluruh Malaysia akan dikristiankan …

Tajuk di atas adalah petikan sebahagian ucapan Khalid Samad pada 7hb Ogos 1987 di Parit Amal Johor semasa menjawat Setiausaha Pemuda PAS Pusat ketika itu.
Petikan ucapan beliau boleh dibaca dalam laporan kertas putih Parlimen 1988, Kertas Perintah 14, Tahun 1988, bertajuk Ke Arah Memelihara Keselamatan Negara.
Dalam ucapan tersebut, Khalid dilaporkan memberitahu hadirin tentang ancaman gerakan Kristianisasi dan jika ianya tidak dibendungkan maka “ … seluruh Malaysia akan dikristiankan selewat-lewatnya pada tahun 2000 …”
The contents of Khalid Samad’s alarmist speech are abstracted from a White Paperon Ops Lalang presented to Parliament on 24 March 1988 — see also scan of relevant pages below (credit: blogger Jebat Must Die).
BELOW: The black flag of ar-Raya (jihad) has been raised

Ar-Raya

“Basah ia (keris) dengan darah Cina”

To refresh your memory, 1987 was the year when the placard “Basah ia (keris) dengan darah Cina” was displayed during an Umno Youth protest gathering at the Jalan Raja Muda stadium on Oct 17. The ISA swoop commenced shortly after.
The fear entertained by Khalid Samad back in 1987 has not come to pass … yet.
Nonetheless the government White Paper has recorded the suspicions with which the PAS leaders – among them party president Yusof Rawa (Mujahid’s father) and then Youth leader Mat Sabu – held of evangelistas at the material time.
The call in Oct0ber 1987 to bathe the keris in Chinese blood shows how angry the Malays were but the Facebook generation hammering away at their nifty high tech gadgets are oblivious and buta sejarah.
Today it is the Muslims who are angry because for the Christians to appropriate the ‘Allah’ word is perbuatan syirik. They are lying about the nature of Allah in their insistence that God is Three.
Coupled with the present religious strife is the nature of the Dapster-evangelistas themselves. They can’t stop their tipu, their bohong and their endless putar-belit. Sudah menjadi darah daging.
Some might counter that provocation through words does not deserve retaliation through action. They argue that insults are merely verbal and it is not a proportionate response for the other side to turn violent.
But how does any decent and conscionable person fight the Evangelista Bintang Tiga whose chief weapon is FITNAH and for whose behaviour there is no cure?
If the DAP does not want Umno Youth to make any further threats on burning down buildings, then stop provoking. And above all, stop lying.
(1,051 words)

RELATED: 
The Sneaky Star and its nest of evangelistas
Note that The J-Star was suspended in 1987 as a threat to national security


No comments:

Post a Comment