"Arul Kanda giving the finger to PAC"
Pak Hussein,
Just to share this...
"He
also stressed that when concerns began to be raised pertaining to 1MDB,
he has ordered the A-G and the PAC for a detailed explanation."
“I have ordered the A-G and PAC to investigate 1MDB’s books.
Anyone found guilty of embezzlement or misappropriation will be brought to justice..."
May 17, 2015 - 1MDB: Najib Promises To Bring Those Guilty In Embezzling To Justice -
http://www.malaysiandigest.com/frontpage/29-4-tile/553999-1mdb-najib-promises-to-bring-those-guilty-in-embezzling-to-justice.htmlWell,
Arul Kanda has been well advised & groomed by his "Masters" &
so the same finger also applies to PAC's from his Master...!
"...There is something about a court of law that scares Prime Minister Najib Razak and wife Rosmah Mansor. Why?
Because
in a court of law, anything you say will be recorded for public record
and you would not dare, unless intentionally, lie in an open court.
So
when the issue of calling the first couple to take the witness stand in
the sodomy trial against Anwar Ibrahim came around, both Najib amd
Rosmah took the easy way out - show us the subpoena!
The KL High
Court was told they had refused to co-operate. Interviews are usually
conducted to determine whether a witness will be called to testify in a
trial. “They have refused to come to court, to be interviewed by the
defence unless they were served with a subpoena,” Solicitor-General II
Mohd Yusof Zainal Abiden told the court.
More than likely, Najib
and Rosmah may have been briefed by the Attorney General, who must have
assured the first couple it was fine to hide behind technicality. Both
husband and wife have been accused of hatching the sodomy charges
iagainst Anwar in a bid to tarnish and derail his political career.
A
subpoena or summons is issued by a court of law to compel a person to
be a witness in a court of law. It is provided for under Section 34(1)
of Act 593 - Criminal Procedure Code. And this is the technicality that
Najib and Rosmah are hiding behind. Until and when a judge signs a
summons order, the two are not obliged to appear in court.
Judiciary muzzled since the 80s
This
bit of technicality enforces the fact that the Judiciary in Malaysia is
in such a broken state that law and order is dictated by an elite few
who hold high office in Malaysia.
The 1988 Malaysian
constitutional crisis (also known as the 1988 judicial crisis) was a
series of events that began with United Malays National Organisation
(UMNO) party election in 1987 and ended up with the suspension and the
eventual removal of the Lord President of the Supreme Court, Tun Salleh
Abas, from his seat.
The Supreme Court in the years leading up to 1988 had been increasingly independent of the other branches of the government.
Matters
then came to a head when Mahathir Mohamad, who believed in the
supremacy of the executive and legislative branches, became Prime
Minister.
Many saw his eventual sacking of Salleh Abas and two
other Supreme Court judges as the end of judicial independence in
Malaysia, and Mahathir's actions were condemned internationally.
Since 1988, there have been regular calls for an official review of the government's actions throughout the crisis.
In
2008, newly appointed de-facto Law Minister Zaid Ibrahim said the
government had to make an open apology to the sacked judges, calling the
government's actions during the crisis "inappropriate". Not long after,
Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi called the crisis one which the
nation had never recovered from, and announced ex gratia compensation
for the sacked and suspended judges.
And though all the above was
done by Najib’s predecessor, it had not return the judiciary to its
former state. Instead, Najib himself has successfully manipulated the
courts so as not be called as witness even-though his involvement in
both the Scorpenes and Sodomy II cases are glaring..."
http://wargamarhaen.blogspot.com/2011/08/catch-us-if-you-can-najib-and-rosmah.html?m=1You be the judge.
